Friday, February 25, 2011
Ummm, no.
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Sunshine and Sedatives, or Seeing My First Surgery
Monday, February 14, 2011
Book Review
I've lately made a jump start to my personal reading again. What have I started off with? Committed, by Elizabeth Gilbert.
By the time I was through the first chapter, I thought I would write something like: Excellently written and wonderfully pithy throughout. Perhaps it is her ability to “write like a man” that I find so attractive as prose styles go.
Of course, by chapter 3 and beyond, my response became more nuanced: Perhaps as the recently married child of divorced and re-married (to other people) parents, I have my own presumptions about why it takes Ms. Gilbert so long to figure out that marriage, not only doesn’t, but shouldn’t guarantee happiness without blemish.
If that seems like a radical statement, humour me for a moment. A marriage guarantees nothing: it’s the partner you chose, and the work both of you are willing to put into that relationship that determines conditions in which you can choose to be happy. I think because I think of happiness as a choice, I don’t have the dilemma that my husband’s sole job in life is to make me perfectly, blissfully, insanely happy...all the time. He can do the dishes without me asking, vacuum, put everything away after I've cooked dinner – even cook dinner after getting in from being our home’s sole provider – and give me whatever else I ask for, but I can still be unhappy. I don’t deny that other people’s actions have an effect upon our moods, and by extension our personalities, but I think of Edward Partridge who was tarred and feathered by and angry Missouri mob and yet felt no hatred toward a single man jack of them.
Now, I don’t really see any similarity between my husband and some angry frontiersmen aside from all being men, but I can still be happy if he is distant some nights, or forgets to wash the dishes, or doesn’t realise that he’s doing something particularly annoying. I can be happy because I chose to be. Because I know that he is not his mistakes and shortcomings; he’s not even his strengths and virtues...this is most definitely an instance where I side with the phrase from Gestalt theory which says that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. I can be happy because he – and I with him – creates an environment where happiness is a choice that is easier for me to make.
Okay, so to my assertion that marriage shouldn't guarantee happiness: that's too easy. If you never have any challenges, how do you grow together? If you're always happy, you forget what unhappiness is...which makes you appreciate the good times much less. And it creates a false premise. If marriage, full stop, no qualifiers, guarantees happiness, then the claim can be made that whatever relationship problems I have with my significant other will magically disappear once we say "I do" and sign a register.
So to Ms. Gilbert's unrealistic expectations of marriage, I say: grow up. You'll be happier when you do. (To be fair, she very well might "grow up" by the end of the book...)
There are other issues I take with some of her perspectives throughout the book - and I'm still finishing it - but on the whole, I can appreciate her journey to search out the truth that might confirm or debunk her prejudices. It's an interesting and entertainingly written book, and not nearly as girly as I was imagining when I first picked it up (yay!).
So as I keep reading, I'll keep a look-out for other premises that Ms. Gilbert either debunks, proves, or runs amok with. Her views on feminism and marriage might be interesting to tackle.
Friday, February 4, 2011
For the Love of All That is Decent...
- Are we supposed to be able to read those Bible verses in the beginning? Let's try learning to focus the camera before we shoot the bad music video.
- So this relationship is a barter system? He gives her church attendance and she gets naked? Charming. Really, as Neanderthal as this is, it's pathetic at the same time.
- Can we please pretty please, for the last time stop pretending that no man on earth can keep it in his pants!?!
- Can we also stop pretending that women don't have sexual drives of their own? Dear Little Miss Purity Ring: it's not a temptation if you don't want it, too.
- The singing is atrocious. That offends me almost as much as the blatant sexism.
- Your virginity is not an object! The next person I hear talking about giving "it" away, is getting a smack. Being a virgin is either something you are or you aren't. And for the record, you can technically remain a virgin and still be unchaste. Likewise, if you aren't a virgin, it doesn't automatically make you slut-tastic. It's all about the attitude and perspective you bring to it.
- You are not a piece of gum to remain pristine and untouched in the foil wrapper until marriage. If you have sex before marriage, you are not a chewed-up piece of gum that no one else will want.
- The decision to practise abstinence until marriage and complete fidelity afterwards has to be a personal decision. Make it for the right reasons: because it's compatible with your moral code, because whatever you believe God says on the subject, it's something you want to do, or see the value in as it applies to your own life. Don't do it because people tell you to, and don't not do it because people tell you to. Hear both sides of the argument, ponder it, decide what you believe, and then live that way.
- Stop demonizing sex. It's just stupid.
Thursday, February 3, 2011
The Mornings
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Another shameless blog plug









